Wednesday, March 11, 2009

Say Goodbye to Conspicuous Consumption

Depew and Shedlock are at it again, discussing an ongoing topic that should be well understood by now, but still seems foreign to most: the ushering in of a new era toward frugality and away from conspicuous consumption.

First, an anecdote. I had an interesting conversation with my grandfather this week that highlights this quite well. He is still self-sufficient, despite pushing a 9-handle and is very "with it," reading through the papers daily and even this blog on occasion (Hi Grandpa!). He was telling me how he has naturally started cutting back on his expenses, even though he admits he doesn't really have to. I told him I had been doing the same - without even really trying to. I started eating potatoes - a monotonous routine of my childhood that I learned to hate, but now like again. I found a really good bottle of organic french wine for 3 Euros that I have stuck with, instead of dabbling in the 7-8 Euro bottles. I gave myself a pay raise after logging better trading profits, but I don't use it. I'm spending even less than I was before. My grandfather's frugality should come as no surprise. He was a child of the depression. He learned to save what he had and to live within his means. What he has witnessed over the last few decades is extremely foreign to him. Our younger generations will develop the same attitudes toward debt and risk taking as his generation has.

This change in consumer behaviour is one reason of many that will ensure that any reinflationary efforts are futile - but one that I have never seen a mainstream economist acknowledge. Paradoxically, for adherents to neoclassical economics, this change in consumer behaviour will also sew the seeds for recovery. As the savings rate rises, people will eventually begin to use their savings for investment in productive capacity. I say "paradoxically for neoclassicals" because to Austrian Economists, changes in consumer time preferences are what the driver behind the business cycle should be. It is well understood. But for the neoclassicals, consumer choices in regards to their spending habits need to be controlled in order to prevent the twisted phenomenon of "paradox of thrift."

Depew writes in #5 of his daily "5 Things" article:

“It’s kind of funny, but I feel much more satisfied with the things money can’t buy, like the well-being of my family, I’m just not seeking happiness from material things any more”
- New York Times, "Conspicuous consumption, a Casualty of Recession," March 9, 2009

If the 90s and most of the first half of the 2000s were about accumulating and displaying "wealth," the next decade will continue the mean reversion toward something altogether more austere, if not more sensible. Debt reduction and the rejection of (and guilt projection toward) materialism will continue as meditations on not just doing more with less, but doing less... period.

All manias leave something undervalued. What has been undervalued for a long time now - reflection, quietude and time, to name but a few of the things "money can't buy" - will now enter their own bull market, which entails a different ordering of priorities and a more challenging view of what it means to "possess wealth."

While this may seem refreshing and positive in the way I've oversimplified it, the difficulties we face going forward will lie in how capitalism seeks to commoditize things that are difficult to measure and quantify, and what mediums of exchange compete for primacy in the market for these intangibles.

Shedlock comments:

Changing attitudes are what Bernanke faces in his battle to inflate. Flaunting wealth is out. Frugality is in. I have been talking about frugality for quite some time. A Google search of this blog for the words Frugal, Frugality pulls up 88 instances (soon to be 89). I am quite sure this is not the end of it.

...

Those preaching inflation simply do not understand the role attitudes play on the the Fed's ability to inflate, nor do they understand the Fiat World Mathematical Model that also hinders the Fed's ability to inflate.


Truer words have never been spoken. If you have been led to believe that a few trillion in credit swaps are going to cause a Weimar-style hyperinflation, you have been misled. Chances are, those telling you this are trying to sell you something at the same time. "Stocks will rebound because of it. Home prices will bottom soon because of it. Gold is going to $5000/oz because of it. Oh, and by the way. If you want to buy any of the above, I'm your man."

When the next economic expansion takes place, it will not be on the back of asset speculation. The sooner we realize this truth, the sooner that expansion will take place.

Things that need to occur prior to recovery:

1) An increase in the rate of savings - probably to above 10%
2) A liquidation in all major asset classes
3) A reduction in the costs of operating businesses (via overhead costs, tax cuts, red tape reductions, etc)
4) A number of structural changes to accommodate 1-3

We can either do this the easy way or the hard way.


Disclaimer: The content on this site is provided as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. All site content, including advertisements, shall not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell any security or financial instrument, or to participate in any particular trading or investment strategy. The ideas expressed on this site are solely the opinions of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the opinions of sponsors or firms affiliated with the author(s). The author may or may not have a position in any company or advertiser referenced above. Any action that you take as a result of information, analysis, or advertisement on this site is ultimately your responsibility. Consult your investment adviser before making any investment decisions.

2 comments:

Namke von Federlein said...

A nice post.

In fact, I think that a huge boost in productivity will be the result of this current market adjustment.

However, I think that you will see the working people improve their productivity much faster than corporations and government.

Individuals have little control over their income but total control over their expenses - and there has been a huge amount of waste. The icon of this is the Starbuck's latte.

Corporations have their productivity equation skewed by government policy *around the world*.

Governments are ridiculously inefficient. Example : education. With a good online grade 1 course you could give every student a private tutor for about $ 10 per month (using computers). Yet, every year, millions of grade 1 teachers "reinvent" grade one. What a waste!

I've said for years : the more things you own, the more *things* own you?

Meadowlark PC Repair said...

We own three vehicles:

- 2007 Hyundai Santa Fe that my wife drives.

- 1989 Chevy Asto Van that I use as the service vehicle for my business and my personal vehicle.

- 1973 Chevy Cheyenne pickup truck. Very sad looking and rusted, but runs well.

I've learned that if I have to use the 4WD Santa Fe to make a service call because of icy roads, I get negative comments from customers about how well my business must be doing if I can afford a fancy new vehicle. If I show up in my van (nicknamed the Snarge Barge because of the number of birds that have bounced off the windscreen), people will say "you poor bastard" as they hand over the cheque.

This reaction is SO noticeable that I desperately try to avoid showing up at customers' homes in the newer vehicle, and it has only become more pronounced since the economy hit the skids. I make a point of showing up either in the van or the even more desperate looking truck.


View My Stats